Do you believe that in the case of Macaques vs Slater there was an “abuse of the concept of intellectual rights” and the whole selfie case was miles away from the original intention of the legislator? Do you believe that this was… Continue Reading
“I find that the guardians of the monkey are correct: Naruto owns his photo”. A peer’s conclusion caught my attention and makes me wonder if animals can have copyrights? Slater is a British Wildlife photographer so I would here make reference to the… Continue Reading
“I think the future is closer than the expected”, this is an interesting statement and makes me think again, at the pace AI has advanced, the copyright laws and regulations have failed to match up their speed and are far… Continue Reading
As mentioned by one of my peers, “I find that the guardians of the monkey are correct: Naruto owns his photo”. This conclusion about the famous controversy surrounding the Naruto and Slater case, caught my attention and makes me wonder if animals… Continue Reading
A peer mentioned, “I believe this would entail an explicit ruling on whether machines may be assigned IP rights whilst stipulating the basis on which these rights may be accredited; such as the amount of processing done in response to… Continue Reading
A peer mentioned Amazon and highlighted the fact that we as user, often give consent to the privacy rules without even reading them. In April last year, the chief Information Security Officer at AWS announced that its services would be… Continue Reading